![]() World at War has a different feel to those of Modern Warfare as its set in World War II but the graphics are still impressive. As happens on all games the first impression you have is of its graphical capabilities. Anyway, what is done is done and Treyarch tried to make the best game they could. However, it followed in the footsteps of the fantastically addictive Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare. If released two years earlier this title would be a game that everyone would be waxing lyrical about. When creating Call of Duty: World at War, Treyarch didn't stand a chance. Ps please don't let your self's be convinced by all the hype and criticism go and try it yourself. All in all the game is just as great as COd:4 if not better, only differences are: The WW2 setting, More intense gore, more perks, Tank playing and a little bit better graphics. I, myself are not at all upset that infinity ward decided to go back to World War 2, in fact that is what I was hoping for considering that all the other world war 2 call of duty games were not nearly as good as COD:4 I was expecting them to go back and make a proper World War 2 game. The added Nazi Zombie mini game is very fun to play and a welcome extra for any sequels. The story line is very similar to that of Cod:4 with an intense sniper mission and a bombardment mission with an added tank mission. The story line of the game is just amazing, the intense action makes you feel in the game. For example when you get a grenade thrown at you your leg may come off or your arm, this holds true for the equivalent of the 50 calibre sniper rifle in the game. Using the same engine as the previous games the graphics are very similar to COD:4 the gore of the game is excellent and much more realistic than the gore in Cod:4. The sequel to Call of duty modern warfare brings the same gameplay with a few improvements. One can only hope many more World War Two games will be produced of such excellence so that we may continue to grow in our understanding of that time and our respect for what the heroes endured eternally. Beautifully produced and superbly scripted and scored, this will remain a classic for those of us who salute the brave combat veterans of the bloodiest conflicts in history. There are few too many such fantastically exciting moments to mention but time after time you will find yourself pushed to the limits of your endurance and suffering the fatigue of intense combat in unendurable environments. The war with Japan is especially stupendous with maniacal banzai charges that will have you running for your life and an astonishing attack accomplished as you ride on a machine gun mounted elephant. I am perplexed by the response of some reviewers to the fact that this is Second World War game and another stirring tribute to the soldiers who made such horrendous sacrifices to defeat the Axis and save freedom for all. While I admit I am a bit behind the curve on video games and play on a Play Station 2, this is still a stunning experience of war and an incredibly exhausting, frightening, and challenging World War II game. To sum up, if you want to play a really involved FPS any call of duty will do ya, however world at war is special and will keep thrilled for much longer than other games. Zombie mode offers a great break while offering merit. The improvements from its predecessors are many although some of the maps don't seem to have been thought through. The multiplayer offers players a long term service and the map packs are a welcome enhancement. ![]() The content is much more mature than seen before and this adds to the other-all experience. The graphics are stunning and the gameplay is challenging yet rewarding. As for the single player campaign its 10/10, its lenghty and diverse, it captures you in a atmosphere never seen before in a ww2 shooter. If you stuck in having never played cod4 you would be amazed, having played cod4 it isn't so stunning. If your looking for an opinion on which game is better I honestly couldn't say. I played the game and tried not to compare it to cod4 but as it is so simular it's hard not to. It seems a lot of people are just unhappy that they've gone back to ww2 and that initial annoyance has tarred their judgement. ![]() I've read so many articles rubbishing and treyarch and I can't help but wonder if they've even given this game a chance.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |